The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1624•In re: William Douglas Hampton
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1624
In re: WILLIAM DOUGLAS HAMPTON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:15-cv-00464-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Douglas Hampton, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Douglas Hampton petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has failed to comply with this
court’s mandate to transfer several motions to the docket of his
pending declaratory judgment action. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has
complied with the directions of our mandate. See Hampton v.
Fed. Corr. Complex Petersburg, No. 1:15-cv-00318-CMH-TCB (E.D.
Va. Apr. 6, 2016). Accordingly, because the district court has
already taken the action Hampton requests, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.