The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1585•Charles Clair v. John Doe, Clerk of the States Attorney's Office of St. Mary's County, Md
16-1585Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1585
CHARLES CLAIR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN DOE, CLERK OF THE STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF ST. MARY'S
COUNTY, MD; JOHN DOE, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary's
County, MD,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THOMAS V. MIKE MILLER, JR., Attorney; PETER O'NEIL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14-
cv-00713-PWG)
Submitted: November 4, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Clair, Appellant Pro Se. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General,
Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting
the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-
cv-00713-PWG (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.