The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1556•Gerald Innocent v. the Bank of New York Mellon
16-1556Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1556
GERALD INNOCENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY; ERIN
SHAFFER, Esq.; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;
MELVIN C. HIGH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16-
cv-01132-PWG)
Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Innocent, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Innocent appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action as barred by res judicata. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Innocent’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Innocent has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d
423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.