The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1550•Phillip Mizrach, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I.… v. United States of America
16-1550Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 9, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1550
PHILLIP MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the
Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 16-1551
PHILLIP MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the
Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-01153-RDB; 1:08-cv-02030-AMD)
Submitted: March 1, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before TRAXLER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Mizrach, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United
States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney,
Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mizrach appeals the district court’s orders denying
several postjudgment motions he filed following the dismissal of
two Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012)
complaints. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Mizrach v. United States, Nos. 1:11-
cv-01153-RDB; 1:08-cv-02030-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2015; Apr. 13,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.