The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1310•Freddie J. Kelly v. Suntrust Bank; Equifax Information Services, LLC; Experian; Transunion
16-1310Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1310
FREDDIE J. KELLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; EXPERIAN;
TRANSUNION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00121-JAG)
Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: December 2, 2016
Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddie J. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia; John Willard
Montgomery, Jr., MONTGOMERY & SIMPSON, LLLP, Richmond, Virginia;
Jennifer Loraine Swize, JONES DAY, Washington, D.C.; Paul L.
Myers, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Michael R. Ward,
MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Freddie J. Kelly appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly
v. SunTrust Bank, No. 3:14-cv-00121-JAG (E.D. Va. Feb. 25,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.