The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1200•Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC v. Original Drifters, Inc.
16-1200Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1200
TREADWELL ORIGINAL DRIFTERS, LLC,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ORIGINAL DRIFTERS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00580-LO-TCB)
Submitted: February 17, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cindy D. Salvo, THE SALVO LAW FIRM, P.C., West Caldwell, New
Jersey, for Appellant. James M. Slattery, BIRCH, STEWART,
KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC, appeals the district
court’s order granting Original Drifters, Inc.’s motion for
summary judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the
joint appendix and conclude that the district court did not err
in applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Treadwell Original Drifters, LLC v. Original Drifters, Inc., No.
1:15-cv-00580-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 28, 2016 & entered
Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.