The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1170•Patricia Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University
16-1170Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1170
PATRICIA FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 16-1171
PATRICIA GRIFFIETH FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00448-FL; 5:15-cv-00527-FL)
Submitted: August 24, 2016 Decided: September 13, 2016
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirk J. Angel, ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina,
for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General,
Stephanie A. Brennan, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Griffieth Flanigan appeals the district court’s
order granting Fayetteville State University’s motions to
dismiss her harassment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant
to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have considered the
parties’ arguments and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Flanigan v. Fayetteville State Univ., Nos. 5:15-cv-00448-FL,
5:15-cv-00527-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.