The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1128•Don J. Beads v. Maryland State Police; Marcus L. Brown; Terrence B. Sheridan
16-1128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 13, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1128
DON J. BEADS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND STATE POLICE; MARCUS L. BROWN; TERRENCE B.
SHERIDAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:12-cv-03219-WDQ)
Submitted: September 20, 2016 Decided: October 13, 2016
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tonya Baña, TONYA BAÑA, LLC, Pikesville, Maryland, for
Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland,
Phillip M. Pickus, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Don Beads appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants summary judgment on Beads’ race discrimination
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration
of Rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Beads v. Md. State Police, No. 1:12-cv-03219-
WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.