The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-8018•United States of America v. Angelo Galloway, a/k/a Gelo
15-8018Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-8018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANGELO GALLOWAY, a/k/a Gelo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:10-cr-00096-MSD-TEM-2)
Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant
United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Angelo Galloway appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. At this juncture, Galloway
can no longer seek relief from his guilty plea pursuant to Fed.
R. Crim. P. 11. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e). Insofar as his
motion could be construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) motion, the district court lacked jurisdiction to
consider it. See United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 397 (4th
Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.