Momolu V.s. Sirleaf v. C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside Chaplin Services, Inc., sued individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-8017
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside Chaplin Services, Inc., sued
individually and in official capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young,
Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00338-MHL-RCY)
Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order denying his motion for appointment of counsel without
prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Sirleaf seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Sirleaf’s pending
motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --