The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7559•Joseph Michael Griffith v. Captain Demitrius Clark
15-7559Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7559
JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN DEMITRIUS CLARK; DONALD L. WHIDBEE; JOHN DOE;
OFFICER REGINALD RUSSELL; SERGEANT GAIL H. BOYD; CAPTAIN
TOMMY CASTELLOE; LIEUTENANT MICHAEL DELOACH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03209-FL)
Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm
Johnson, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Griffith v. Clark, No. 5:11-ct-03209-FL (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.