The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7550•United States of America v. Barton Joseph Adams
15-7550Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7550
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BARTON JOSEPH ADAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
District Judge. (3:08-cr-00077-JPB-RWT-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2016 Decided: February 23, 2016
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barton Joseph Adams, Appellant Pro Se. William J. Ihlenfeld,
II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alan McGonigal,
Michael D. Stein, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Barton Joseph Adams appeals from the district court’s
September 23, 2015 order denying 16 of his motions filed in
2014. On appeal, Adams fails to explain how the district court
erred in its denial decisions. Accordingly, Adams has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b);
Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607
(4th Cir. 2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430
n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.