The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7515•United States of America v. Hassaan Haakim Rashaad
15-7515Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7515
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HASSAAN HAAKIM RASHAAD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hassaan Haakim Rashaad, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hassaan Haakim Rashaad appeals the district court’s order
denying Rashaad’s motion for clarification of the schedule of
restitution payments set forth in his 2002 criminal judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Rashaad, No. 3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.