The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7441•United States of America v. Rodney Kashawn Wilson
15-7441Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODNEY KASHAWN WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:09-cr-00164-RAJ-FBS-1)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Kashawn Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Damian J. Hansen,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Westley
Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Kashawn Wilson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Wilson, No. 2:09-cr-00164-RAJ-FBS-1
(E.D. Va. filed Aug. 28 & entered Aug. 31, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.