The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7365•United States of America v. Gregory George Rutledge
15-7365Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7365
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GREGORY GEORGE RUTLEDGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:04-cr-00321-LMB-1)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory George Rutledge, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Hanly,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory George Rutledge appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to terminate his supervised release judgement
under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Rutledge, No. 1:04-cr-00321-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 12 &
entered Aug. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.