The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7357•James Stephon Mcdowell, a/k/a James S. McDowell v. Carol E. Mitchell-Hamilton
15-7357Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7357
JAMES STEPHON MCDOWELL, a/k/a James S. McDowell,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROL E. MITCHELL-HAMILTON; JOHN B. TOMARCHIO; TIANNA R.
RANDOLPH; ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III; T. MONTGOMERY; BRYAN
STERLING; EVELYN BARBER, Head Food Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (9:14-cv-02132-BHH)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Stephon McDowell, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr.,
Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Stephon McDowell appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton, No. 9:14-cv-02132-BHH (D.S.C.
July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.