The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7324•United States of America v. Aloysius Jamego Ber Mclaughlin, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke
15-7324Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7324
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ALOYSIUS JAMEGO BER MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9)
Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred
William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
McLaughlin, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9 (D.S.C., Aug. 6, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.