The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7220•Jeff Farmer v. Mhm Maryland, Inc.; Dr. Vincent Siracusano; Dr. Howard Penn
15-7220Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7220
JEFF FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MHM MARYLAND, INC.; DR. VINCENT SIRACUSANO; DR. HOWARD PENN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14-
cv-03080-PWG)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2015
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeff Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald McGlenn Cherry, BONNER
KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeff Farmer appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s
motions to reexamine filing in forma pauperis, for appointment of
counsel, for injunctive relief, and to amend the complaint, and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farmer v.
MHM Md., Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03080-PWG (D. Md. July 2, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.