The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7066•James Hairston v. GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent
15-7066Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7066
JAMES HAIRSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director;
MARTY STALLARD, Director of Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon,
District Judge. (7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015
Amended: November 20, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Hairston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Hairston appeals the district court’s orders denying
class certification, separating a jointly filed civil action
into separate civil actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and
dismissing Hairston’s complaint without prejudice for failure to
comply with the court’s prior order to file an affidavit of his
intent to proceed and other documents. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. McPeak,
No. 7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. June 3, 2015; June 4, 2015;
June 5, 2015; June 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.