The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6976•Connell D. Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw; Officer Strickland; Officer Russell; Officer Bullard; Officer J. Prince
15-6976Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6976
CONNELL D. HAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER RUSSELL;
OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015)
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.