United States of America v. Kelly George Stanback

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6969
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KELLY GEORGE STANBACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelly George Stanback, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb
Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Elizabeth G.
Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kelly George Stanback appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Stanback, No. 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1 (W.D. Va. filed June
8 and entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Stanback’s § 3582
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce
Stanback’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

-- 2 of 2 --