The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6933•Frankie Jae Lordmaster, a/k/a Jason Robert Goldader v. IVAN DARNELL DAVIS, Magistrate - E.D. Va., Alexandria Div.
15-6933Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6933
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, a/k/a Jason Robert Goldader,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
IVAN DARNELL DAVIS, Magistrate - E.D. Va., Alexandria Div.;
JAMES C. CACHERIS, Dist. Judge - E.D. Va., Alexandria Div.;
MR. FLOYD; MR. NIEMEYER; MR. SHEDD; ANDREW DOWNS, Clerk -
U.S. Sup. Ct.; SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk - U.S. Sup. Ct.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00319-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frankie Jae LordMaster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frankie Jae LordMaster appeals the district court’s order
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny LordMaster’s
motions for access of counsel to the original record, for
consideration of Supreme Court Rule 19, to stay judgment, to
join appeals and parties, and to further develop facts, and we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. LordMaster
v. Davis, No. 1:15-cv-00319-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. May 15, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.