The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6908•Joey Duane Scott v. Reuben Franklin Young; Robert C. Lewis; Frank L. Perry; Hattie Pimpong; James M. Johnson
15-6908Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 12, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6908
JOEY DUANE SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG; ROBERT C. LEWIS; FRANK L. PERRY;
HATTIE PIMPONG; JAMES M. JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03159-FL)
Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 12, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joey Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joey Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and certain
nondispositive orders. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Scott v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03159-FL
(E.D.N.C. June 19, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014, Jan. 22, 2015; Apr. 15,
2015; May 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.