The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6905•Joseph Ruhren v. MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police
15-6905Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6905
JOSEPH RUHREN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police;
LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C.; MELETIS, Superintendent
Manassas A.D.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Ruhren, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ruhren appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA
(E.D. Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.