The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6904•United States of America v. Hugh Epps
15-6904Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 4, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6904
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HUGH EPPS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1)
Submitted: October 2, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugh Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Michael
Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hugh Epps appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Epps, No. 3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1
(E.D. Va. May 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.