United States of America v. Robert Keith Ross

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6846
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT KEITH ROSS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Keith Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Keith Ross appeals the district court’s order
construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as such. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Ross, Nos. 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR
(W.D.N.C. May 11, 2015). We deny Ross’s motion for a
certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --