United States of America v. Michael Crandale Williams

15-6780Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6780
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J.
Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00009-H-1)
Submitted: July 10, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.