The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6696•James Strouse v. Bureau of Prisons
15-6696Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6696
JAMES STROUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS; K. KIDDY, Unit Manager; BLACKBURN,
Counselor; BERNARDO, SIS; BENNETT, DHO; WHITLEY, Trust Fund
Supervisor; E. D. WILSON, Warden; NEGRONE, SIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00044-REP)
Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Strouse, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Strouse appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), without prejudice
in part and with prejudice in part. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Strouse v. Bureau of
Prisons, No. 3:13-cv-00044-REP (E.D. Va April 21, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.