The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6687•JOHN ERVIN WILSON, JR. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E. Wilson v. Officer Shamika Broddy
15-6687Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 5, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6687
JOHN ERVIN WILSON, JR. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E.
Wilson,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER SHAMIKA BRODDY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
Judge. (9:14-cv-02531-BM)
Submitted: October 28, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015
Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Ervin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE
ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Ervin Wilson appeals the magistrate judge’s* order
granting summary judgment to defendant and dismissing Wilson’s
complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Broddy,
No. 9:14-cv-02531-BM (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.