United States of America v. Curtis Daryle Tinsley

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6598
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS DARYLE TINSLEY,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:06-cr-00009-JLK-2)
Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Daryle Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Daryle Tinsley appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Tinsley, No. 4:06-cr-
00009-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --