The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6553•United States of America v. David Wright
15-6553Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6553
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Wright appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Wright, No. 6:05-cr-
01163-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.