The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6471•Andrew Drayton, Jr. v. State, etc
15-6471Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 5, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6471
ANDREW DRAYTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE, etc,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (0:14-cv-01548-RMG)
Submitted: January 21, 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Drayton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Drayton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without
prejudice.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Drayton v. State, No. 0:14-cv-01548-RMG (D.S.C.
July 3, 2014). We deny Drayton’s motion to expedite as moot and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* This case has recently been returned to this court after a
limited remand for a timeliness determination. The district
court has granted Drayton’s motion to reopen the appeal period.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.