The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6464•Steven Prevonce Lamb v. Harold Clarke
15-6464Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 21, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6464
STEVEN PREVONCE LAMB,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00268-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: August 18, 2015 Decided: August 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Prevonce Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Prevonce Lamb appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action without prejudice because of the absence
of a case or controversy. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. Lamb v. Clarke, No. 1:15-cv-00268-CMH-TCB
(E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.