The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6372•Alexander Otis Matthews v. Michael Richard Pauze
15-6372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6372
ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL RICHARD PAUZE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00248-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion to correct misfiling and dismissing his
complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Pauze, No.
1:14-cv-00248-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.