The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6264•Raymond Edward Gill v. United States of America; Us Parole and Probation; Cja- Attorney
15-6264Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6264
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; US PAROLE AND PROBATION; CJA-
ATTORNEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-00111-RDB)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Gill appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint alleging violations pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gill v.
United States, No. 1:15-cv-00111-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.