Deborah V. Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis v. WILLIAM BYARS, JR.; JUDY ANDERSON; T. TYLER; D. FOULK, a/k/a Officer Foulks; SADI RAFI

15-6207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6207
DEBORAH V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a
Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BYARS, JR.; JUDY ANDERSON; T. TYLER; D. FOULK, a/k/a
Officer Foulks; SADI RAFI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-00033-BHH)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deborah V. Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Deborah V. Hubbard appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hubbard v. Byars,
No. 8:14-cv-00033-BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.