The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6162•Shawn Dwayne Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. SHIFT, (That worked on 5/01/12)
15-6162Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6162
SHAWN DWAYNE BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
E.P.R.U.C. SHIFT, (That worked on 5/01/12); LT. BRETT CALEY;
SGT. CHAD KEEGAN; CO II KEITH CURTIS; CO II ROBERT CANIGLIO;
CO II THEODORE JONES; CO II MICHAEL HANCOCK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:14-cv-00789-RWT)
Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shawn Dwayne Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shawn Dwayne Buckner appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift, (That worked on
5/01/12), No. 8:14-cv-00789-RWT (D. Md. filed Jan. 16, 2015 &
entered Jan. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.