The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6058•Curtis L. King v. Sc Dept of Corrections
15-6058Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 21, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6058
CURTIS L. KING,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(0:14-cv-01677-RBH)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis L. King appeals the district court’s order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice his petition for a writ of mandamus. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because King does
not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in
his informal brief, he has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.