The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6040•Casey Rafael Tyler v. Carlton B. Joyner
15-6040Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6040
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARLTON B. JOYNER; MARSHALL PIKE; FREDERICK STRICKLAND;
ANNETTE JONES; CATHY JUDGE; TALENA LEE; RYAN SMITH; ABRAHAM
MONK; DENNIS ROWLAND; KEITH GRANDERSON; KATHERINE MITCHELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03044-BO)
Submitted: June 29, 2015 Decided: July 31, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion to alter or amend
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Tyler v.
Joyner, No. 5:14-ct-03044-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.