The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-4071•United States of America v. Juan Antonio Pena-Torres, a/k/a C-Money, a/k/a Anthony
15-4071Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 22, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4071
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN ANTONIO PENA-TORRES, a/k/a C-Money, a/k/a Anthony,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cr-00310-JCC-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015
Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Geremy C. Kamens, Acting Federal Public Defender, Patrick L.
Bryant, Appellate Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.
Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Richard D. Cooke,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM
Juan Antonio Pena-Torres appeals his conviction for
distribution of cocaine. He moved for a new trial, alleging
that the Government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct and that
evidence relating to counts dismissed mid-trial prejudiced his
right to a fair trial on the remaining count. We have reviewed
the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no
reversible error in the denial of Pena-Torres’ motion for a new
trial. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief for the
reasons stated by the district court, see United States v. Pena-
Torres, No. 1:14-cr-00310-JCC (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2014), and
affirm the conviction.∗
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ Pena-Torres does not challenge the sentence imposed by the
district court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.