The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2523•Nannette F. Buckner v. JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury
15-2523Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2523
NANNETTE F. BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary, Department of the Treasury;
MARIAM G. GARVEY, Department of the Treasury; JACQUELINE ANN
BERRIEN; ROBERT L. HUNT, Area Director, South Atlantic Area,
Collections Operations,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00199-FL)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: September 2, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Nannette F. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Nannette F. Buckner appeals the district court’s order
accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s
recommendation, and granting Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment in Buckner’s employment discrimination action. Buckner
also appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Buckner v. Lew, No. 5:13-cv-00199-FL
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2015 & Nov. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.