In Re: MARY D. SLAEY v. P.h. Harrington, Jr.

15-2404Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 7, 2016

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2404
In Re: MARY D. SLAEY,
Debtor.
---------------------------------
MARY D. SLAEY,
Debtor – Appellee,
v.
P.H. HARRINGTON, JR.,
Creditor - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: December 7, 2016
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan J. Cilman, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Gregory Counts,
TYLER, BARTL, RAMSDELL & COUNTS, PLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
P.H. Harrington, Jr., appeals from the district court orders
determining that Harrington’s claim asserted in Mary D. Slaey’s
bankruptcy case was barred by the statute of limitations, and
denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record
and the arguments presented on appeal and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Harrington v. Slaey, No. 1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va.
Sept. 1, 2015 & filed Oct. 14, 2015; entered Oct. 15, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.