The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2396•David A. Bardes, individually, as a taxpayer v. L. PATRICK AULD, Magistrate Judge
15-2396Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2396
DAVID A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
L. PATRICK AULD, Magistrate Judge; CATHERINE C. EAGLES,
District Judge; PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Senior U.S. District
Judge; ROBERT CARR, Ex-Magistrate Judge, in their individual
and official capacities; US COURTS; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA; US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; JOHN AND JANE DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Bardes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous and denying his
motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH
(W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.