The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2309•Annie Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
15-2309Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2309
ANNIE FANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District
Judge. (3:15-cv-00474-JAG)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annie Fant, Appellant Pro Se. Antoinette Morgan Walker, MORRIS &
MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Annie Fant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00474-JAG (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2015). We grant
Fant’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny as
moot her motion to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.