The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2206•Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina
15-2206Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2206
JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 15-2294
JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia and Greenville. Mary G. Lewis,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-02841-MGL; 6:15-cv-03108-MGL)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the
records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South
Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens
v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.