The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2076•Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.; Charles Town Gaming, Inc.
15-2076Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 19, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2076
TRAZELL I,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC.; CHARLES TOWN GAMING, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00085-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
De Lonte Trazell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Trazell I appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his
discrimination suit for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Trazell I’s
motion for injunctive relief, and affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.,
No. 3:15-cv-00085-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.