The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2070•Hieda Keeler v. Dr. Lawrence Chang
15-2070Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2070
HIEDA KEELER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. LAWRENCE CHANG; PARISER DERMATOLOGY; DR. DENNIS CRUFF;
HAMPTON SENTARA SURGERY SPECIALISTS; HAMPTON SENTARA
CAREPLEX; DR. BERNIE SKINNER; TIDEWATER DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (4:15-cv-00019-AWA-TEM)
Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015
Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Rodney Seth Dillman,
HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia;
Dorinda Parkola Burton, Michael Todd Gerber, POOLE MAHONEY, PC,
Virginia Beach, Virginia; Isaac Abraham McBeth, RAWLS, MCNELIS &
MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Joseph Tedford McFadden, Jr.,
RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Keeler’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, Keeler has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.