The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1751•Janice Wolk Grenadier v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC
15-1751Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1751
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood,
LLC; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R.
GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank
N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in
their Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN
SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official
and Personal Capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael,
BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary
Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner,
Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons
Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Janice Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders
denying her various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law
Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 15 & 29,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.