James E. Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc.; Slm Corporation

15-1677Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1677
JAMES E. DAVENPORT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SALLIE MAE, INC.; SLM CORPORATION,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
EQUIFAX, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; EXPERIAN
DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS
UNION, LLC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01475-PJM)
Submitted: October 29, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
James E. Davenport, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Bolesta, Denise E.
Giraudo, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
James E. Davenport appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in this civil
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc., No.
8:12-cv-01475-PJM (D. Md. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.