The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1552•Nathaniel Magwood v. JENNIFER HABERSTADT, City of Charleston Police Dept.
15-1552Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 31, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1552
NATHANIEL MAGWOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JENNIFER HABERSTADT, City of Charleston Police Dept.; THOMAS
CONSTANZA, Charleston County Sheriff Dept.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:14-cv-03972-DCN)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Magwood, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Magwood appeals the district court’s order and
judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation and dismissing his civil rights complaint without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Magwood v. Haberstadt, No. 2:14-cv-03972-DCN
(D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.